[Image]

Old–Yankee.Com
Comments on the State of the World and Everyday Things

» Original Letter to the Post Gazette «


 

Web Contents

Blog/Home
Stuff I Wrote
The Right to Keep and
    Bear Arms
Odd Words
Other Interesting Places
Hedda Garza Memorial
~   ~   ~   ~
Statement of Purpose
Who Am I?
Contact

Previous Essays:
Index

Links I Like

Twenty Years of the CIO — 
This is a great piece of
history!

The Ethical Spectacle
NRA
Fascinating Video Lecture
International Journal
    of Occupational and
    Environmental Health
Students for Concealed
     Carry on Campus

Book Review:
“The Man Who Hated Work and Loved Labor — The Life and Times of Tony Mazzocchi” This is a fascinating book about a labor leader who has had tremendous influence on our lives, but whose name is not even known by millions of Americans. Please read my review.

 

The Letter as Originally Submitted

(i.e., before being shortened for publication)


The article Odds don't favor gun owners, doctor states in the Post Gazette of May 3, 1997, could have been greatly improved if the writer had done some background research on the speaker and his studies, and included it in the article. This research would have shown that Dr. Kellermann's studies on firearms in the home are so flawed as to approach being outright dishonest. Your readers deserve to know this, and not just read an article about Kellermann's views as if they are gospel.

Dr. Kellermann's studies purporting to show that a gun in the home is more likely to hurt residents than to drive off a criminal seem to have been designed to show a certain result, and that is not good science. He demonstrates by this that he is an advocate, not an objective researcher.

  • His data ignore any self-defense situation in which the intruder was not killed, and this leaves out more than 99% of such situations.
  • His study didn't mention how many of the households surveyed had a gun present.
  • He only considered burglaries of an occupied single family residence and excluded sexual assaults, meaning that he considered only 1½% of burglaries, a sample so small that one cannot generalize from it anything about the practicality of keeping a gun in the home.
  • His case study included twice as many African-Americans as whites. Since African Americans are homicide victims out of proportion to their population share, this is not generalizable to society.
  • His study doesn't say if the firearm used was the one kept in the home or was brought in by a criminal.
  • He assumes that there are no differences between Seattle and Vancouver, British Columbia, other than the stricter gun-control laws of Canada, and wants us to believe that this is the only thing we should consider to explain crime rate differences.
  • He ignores the fact that a study reported in the The American Journal of Psychiatry from March, 1990, showed that Canada's handgun ban of 1976 reduced the number of suicides by handgun, but that they were completely replaced by suicides by other means, predominantly by jumping off bridges.

In Kellermann's earlier study, reported in the June 12, 1986, New England Journal of Medicine, he cautions:

Mortality studies such as ours do not include cases in which burglars or intruders are wounded or frightened away by the use or display of a firearm. Cases in which would-be intruders may have purposely avoided a house known to be armed are also not identified. We did not report the total number of nonlethal firearm injuries involving guns kept in the home. A complete determination of firearm risks versus benefits would require that these figures be known.

In his later work, he did not follow his own advice, but still wishes us to accept his conclusion that having a gun in the home is more likely to cause than to prevent injury or death.

The work of Dr. Kellermann flies in the face of reputable work in the field of criminology, especially that of Dr. Gary Kleck, of Florida State University (who was awarded the Hindelang Award at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology for his work). Kleck's research has demonstrated that the volume of self-defense situations with guns, most of which take place in or near the home, far exceeds the number of accidents, suicides and murders in which a gun kept in the home plays a role.

Kellermann's speech seems especially curious in light of a remark he made in the March/April, 1994, issue of Health Magazine:

If you've got to resist, your chances of being hurt are less the more lethal your weapon. ... If that were my wife, would I want her to have a .38 Special in her hand? Yeah.

Bruce A. Clark
Highland Park

 

Home ] Up ] Forwards ]

Last Updated — December 11, 2011
All Original Material on This Site ©Bruce A. Clark, 1999-2011 All Rights Reserved